Much has been written about NATO's nuclear problems of the 1980s. Yet little attention has been paid to the perspectives of America, Britain and West Germany in the arms control process and nuclear doctrine debates. This book illuminates previously unnoticed developments which emerged from two unstudied Alliance institutions: the High-Level Group and the Special Consultative Group which was created to coordinate arms control policy. National perspectives manifested themselves through these institutions and this book identifies national preferences and explains the decision-making paradigm which dominated NATO until the INF Treaty of 1987, after which West Germany began to break out of the constraints of the old pattern. The book incorporates unpublished information on important doctrinal developments which document how West Germany achieved, and then lost, long-standing nuclear goals. It also analyzes the relationship between civilian and military NATO bureaucracies, investigating the development and refinement of nuclear planning methodology and the effects of institutional and personal animosity on decision-making.